<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>KLUB 106.9 The Rock &#187; supreme court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1069therock.com/tags/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1069therock.com</link>
	<description>The Best Classic Rock &#38; The Best New Rock</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Defense of Marriage Act Goes Before Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://1069therock.com/supreme-court-doma-hearing-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://1069therock.com/supreme-court-doma-hearing-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Chaberski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsminteractive.com/?p=158692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard its second day of arguments on the issue of same-sex marriage, specifically a challenge to the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). This follows Tuesday&#8217;s case concerning California&#8217;s Proposition 8. The DOMA case, known as United States v. Windsor, covers this: The case concerns the part of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard its second day of arguments on the issue of same-sex marriage, specifically a challenge to the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). This follows <a href="http://newstalkkgvo.com/supreme-court-gay-marriage-case-proposition-8/" target="_blank">Tuesday's case</a> concerning California's Proposition 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://1069therock.com/supreme-court-doma-hearing-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://tsminteractive.com/files/2013/03/Supreme-Court-DOMA-hearing.jpg" height="420" width="630" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Mark Wilson/Getty Images</media:description>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Hears First of Two Gay-Marriage Cases</title>
		<link>http://1069therock.com/supreme-court-gay-marriage-case-proposition-8/</link>
		<comments>http://1069therock.com/supreme-court-gay-marriage-case-proposition-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Chaberski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Country]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot AC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhythmic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsminteractive.com/?p=158629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Hollingsworth v. Perry, the case that is challenging the constitutionality of California&#8217;s Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage. It is the first of two gay-marriage-related cases the court will hear this week; on Wednesday it will hear arguments in United States v. Windsor, a challenge to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Hollingsworth v. Perry, the case that is challenging the constitutionality of California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage. It is the first of two gay-marriage-related cases the court will hear this week; on Wednesday it will hear arguments in United States v. Windsor, a challenge to the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://1069therock.com/supreme-court-gay-marriage-case-proposition-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://tsminteractive.com/files/2013/03/Supreme-Court.jpg" height="420" width="630" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Mark Wilson/Getty Images</media:description>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN and Fox News Botch Report on Supreme Court Health Care Mandate</title>
		<link>http://1069therock.com/cnn-fox-healthcare-rulling/</link>
		<comments>http://1069therock.com/cnn-fox-healthcare-rulling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Deane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefw.com/?p=134366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes, even the most diligent news network can make a mistake. But when two networks botch a report only minutes apart? Well, that qualifies as news itself. Both CNN and Fox News reported that the Supreme Court struck down the centerpiece of President Obama&#8217;s health care bill today. But in reality, the court upheld the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, even the most diligent news network can make a mistake. But when two networks botch a report only minutes apart? Well, that qualifies as news itself.</p>
<p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://1069therock.com/cnn-fox-healthcare-rulling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/1069therock.com/files/2012/06/CNN.jpg" height="376" width="630" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Upholds Obama&#039;s Health Care Law</title>
		<link>http://1069therock.com/supreme-court-upholds-obama-health-care-law/</link>
		<comments>http://1069therock.com/supreme-court-upholds-obama-health-care-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shauna Wright</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsminteractive.com/?p=115898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama administration got an enormous victory on Thursday when the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to uphold the President&#8217;s signature achievement: the 2010 health care law. And in a surprise to many court watchers, it was Chief Justice John Roberts who sided with the more liberal justices and wrote the majority opinion. The central issue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama administration got an enormous victory on Thursday when the <a href="http://nbcpolitics.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/28/12457822-supreme-court-upholds-health-care-law?lite" >Supreme Court voted 5-4</a> to uphold the President&#8217;s signature achievement: the 2010 health care law.</p>
<p>And in a surprise to many court watchers, it was Chief Justice John Roberts who sided with the more liberal justices and wrote the majority opinion.</p>
<p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://1069therock.com/supreme-court-upholds-obama-health-care-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/1069therock.com/files/2012/06/supreme-court-health-care.jpg" height="420" width="630" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Alex Wong, Getty Images</media:description>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Play On! Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on Video Game Sales to Minors</title>
		<link>http://1069therock.com/play-on-supreme-court-strikes-down-ban-on-video-game-sales-to-minors/</link>
		<comments>http://1069therock.com/play-on-supreme-court-strikes-down-ban-on-video-game-sales-to-minors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shauna Wright</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brown v. entertainment merchants association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsminteractive.com/?p=20297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a 7-2 vote, the US Supreme Court ruled Monday that it&#8217;s unconstitutional to ban kids from buying or renting violent video games, saying that despite fears the games may prompt children to emulate what&#8217;s seen in them, the government has no right to &#8220;restrict the ideas to which [they] may be exposed.&#8221; The decision [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a 7-2 vote, the <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_supreme_court_violent_video_games" >US Supreme Court ruled Monday</a> that it&#8217;s unconstitutional to ban kids from buying or renting violent video games, saying that despite fears the games may prompt children to emulate what&#8217;s seen in them, the government has no right to &#8220;restrict the ideas to which  may be exposed.&#8221;</p>
<p>The decision in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Entertainment_Merchants_Association" >Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association</a> upholds that of the 9th Circuit federal appeals court, which previously tossed out a California ban on the sale or rental of such games to minors.</p>
<p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://1069therock.com/play-on-supreme-court-strikes-down-ban-on-video-game-sales-to-minors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/1069therock.com/files/2011/06/117510636-e1309202670125.jpg" height="200" width="300" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Joe Raedle, Getty Images</media:description>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 1026/1143 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/1069therock.com

Served from: 1069therock.com @ 2013-05-22 07:41:32 -->